Eli Shaw Eli Shaw's Profile Page

Eli Shaw Eli Shaw

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Plan & Questions ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam

We offer free demos of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam braindumps for your reference before you pay for them, for there are three versions of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice engine so that we also have three versions of the free demos. And we will send you the new updates if our experts make them freely. On condition that you fail the exam after using our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Guide unfortunately, we will switch other versions for you or give back full of your refund. All we do and the promises made are in your perspective.

The ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor training prep you see on our webiste are definitely the highest quality learning products on the market. Of course, the correctness of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning materials is also very important, after all, you are going to take the test after studying. And a lot of our worthy customers praised our accuracy for that sometimes they couldn't find the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Braindumps on the other websites or they couldn't find the updated questions and answers. Just buy our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study guide and you won't regret!

>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Plan <<

Verified PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Plan With Interarctive Test Engine & Efficient Questions ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam

If only you provide the scanning copy of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor failure marks we will refund you immediately. If you have any doubts about the refund or there are any problems happening in the process of refund you can contact us by mails or contact our online customer service personnel and we will reply and solve your doubts or questions timely. We provide the best service and ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Torrent to you to make you pass the exam fluently but if you fail in we will refund you in full and we won’t let your money and time be wasted. Our questions and answers are based on the real exam and conform to the popular trend in the industry.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Managing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.

Topic 2

Closing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.

Topic 3

AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.

Topic 4

Preparing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q165-Q170):

NEW QUESTION # 165
While preparing for an AIMS audit, a technology company faced an issue with the auditor assigned by the certification body. The auditor lacked a security clearance, which is mandatory for accessing certain sensitive information involved in the audit due to the company's government contracts and proprietary technology. The company requested to replace the auditor with someone who meets the security requirements to ensure the audit can proceed without compromising sensitive information or violating government regulations. Is this acceptable?

A. Yes, the auditor not holding the security clearance required by the auditee is a valid reason to request the replacement of the auditor
B. No, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor has audited the company in the past
C. No, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor is in a conflict of interest situation
D. Yes, only if the replacement is also certified for ISO/IEC 27001

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.7, an auditee has the right to object to the assignment of a particular auditor when justified. A legitimate reason includes lack of required security clearance, which may prevent the auditor from accessing essential audit evidence, especially where government regulations or confidentiality clauses apply.
This is a valid and accepted reason to request a replacement.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.7 - Objection to audit team members
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.2 - Requirements for objectivity and impartiality in audits PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Section: Auditor Selection and Replacement
===========

NEW QUESTION # 166
Which core element emphasizes that AI systems should be designed to avoid bias and ensure fair treatment for all individuals?

A. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
B. Transparency and Explainability
C. Accountability
D. Human-Centered Design

Answer: A

Explanation:
The principle ofFairness and Non-Discriminationis one of the core ethical and governance pillars emphasized inISO/IEC 42001:2023, especially inClause 4.2 (Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties)andClause 6.1 (Actions to address risks and opportunities)where ethical risks related to AI systems are assessed.
According to the standard and accompanying PECB training guide, fairness is defined as ensuring thatAI systems do not create or perpetuate bias, and that individuals and groups aretreated equitably, with measures in place to detect and mitigate discrimination. This is often embedded in risk assessments and operational controls when managing AI systems.
In ISO/IEC 42001, organizations are required to considerethical, legal, and societal impactsof their AI systems, andFairness and Non-Discriminationis a key tenet oftrustworthy AI.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clauses 4.2, 6.1.2, and 8.2.3
PECB Lead Auditor Course Guide, Section on "Ethical Principles of AI," Subsection: Fairness and Non- Discrimination

NEW QUESTION # 167
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Al systems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions when determining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Did the audit team consider all the necessary aspects when determining audit findings?

A. No, audit team did not consider the findings exceeding normal practices or opportunities for improvement
B. Yes, the audit team considered all the necessary aspects for determining audit findings
C. No, the audit team overlooked the importance of the auditee's feedback in shaping the audit findings

Answer: B

Explanation:
The scenario states that the audit team considered:
* audit objectives
* audit criteria
* planned results
* sample size
* conformity to requirements
* and previous records - all key elements ofaudit evidence analysis.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.5andISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6confirm that audit findings must be based onobjective evidence, conformity criteria, and audit scope.This matches what the audit team did, confirming full compliance.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.5; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.

NEW QUESTION # 168
What is the main goal of the 'Transparency and Explainability' core element in AI?

A. To reduce the cost of AI development
B. To improve the speed of AI systems
C. To make AI operations understandable to users and stakeholders
D. To ensure AI systems are user-friendly

Answer: C

Explanation:
The principle ofTransparency and Explainabilityis designed to ensure thatusers and stakeholders can understand how AI systems function, how decisions are made, and what data is used.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 emphasizes that transparency enablestraceability, clarity of design choices, and auditability, while explainability provides insights intohow outputs are generated, especially for high-risk or critical applications.
In practical terms, this principle supports:
* Buildingtrustin AI systems
* Ensuringregulatory compliance
* Facilitatinginformed decision-making
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 (AI risk identification), and 8.2.3 (Operational planning and control) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Transparency and Explainability" as a core ethical value of AI

NEW QUESTION # 169
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Al systems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions whendetermining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 7, for which of the following ISO/IEC 42001 clauses was the minor nonconformity issued?

A. Clause 7.3 Awareness
B. Clause 7.5 Documented information
C. Clause 7.4 Communication

Answer: B

Explanation:
The issue was thatessential AIMS processes (model training, validation, and deployment) were not properly documented- this falls under:
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.5, which requires that "the organization shall ensure documented information is available, adequate, and properly controlled."
* The nonconformity was not about communication or awareness, but thelack of documentation, which is a direct violation of Clause 7.5.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.5; Lead Auditor Manual Section 5 ("Document Control Requirements").

NEW QUESTION # 170
......

As we all know, HR form many companies hold the view that candidates who own a ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor professional certification are preferred, because they are more likely to solve potential problems during work. And the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor certification vividly demonstrates the fact that they are better learners. As for candidates who possessed with a ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor professional certification are more competitive. The current word is a stage of science and technology, social media and social networking has already become a popular means of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Materials. As a result, more and more people study or prepare for exam through social networking. By this way, our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning guide can be your best learn partner.

Questions ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam: https://www.actualcollection.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-exam-questions.html